|
News and Views
1.8.10
Jumping on and off the brand wagon: Brand winners and losers in 2009
A few winners:
Facebook, Twitter and
LinkedIn. The CB radio craze from decades ago proved that people were so
anxious to communicate with other people that they would talk to just about
anybody. Then cell phones allowed us to talk with whomever we wanted at almost
anytime. Now with social networking, we can communicate with dozens, even
hundreds of friends at once. Without a doubt, Facebook has become one of the
hottest brands on the planet. It's at the center of a cultural phenomenon, generating
huge amounts of interaction with its brand. It's a smart phone app, a
management headache in the office, and is rapidly becoming a monstrous
marketing channel of its own. Twitter and LinkedIn are not far behind. Never mind that little sticking point about
lack of revenue. There seems to be no doubt that these three brands will make
money for their owners in a big way.
Ford has a better
idea. In the middle of begging for cash in Washington, Ford came to its
senses and effectively said "we don't need no stinkin' bailout" and flew coach
class back to Detroit to take advantage of their relative strengths in the
domestic auto business. They were the only American brand that was able to sell
their cars more on their merits and less on rebates and promotions. With the
stigma of bailout and bankruptcy tainting everything that GM or Chrysler was
doing, Ford surged ahead with market share (up 1.2%) and profits. Now they are well positioned to be the leading
American car brand of the future.
Apple-iPod,
iPhone, and Mac computers. Apple, Inc. knew what they were doing when they
dropped "Computer" from their name in 2007. They saw how computer technology
was spreading into other devices and have consistently led innovation in the
mp3 and mobile phone arenas as well. With stock analysts predicting a difficult
year for premium priced products like Apple's, the company surprised them all
with strong sales led by the rapid growth of the iPhone line. In addition, ads
for Mac computers continued to hammer away at mighty Microsoft and its crippled
sub-brand, the Vista operating system. By the end of the year Windows 7 (note
the return to a far more trusted name for the OS) was rushed in to replace its
ill-conceived predecessor, which became even more fodder for Mac as they
skillfully transitioned mistrust of Vista to doubts about Windows 7.
A few losers:
Gatorade: about
the only thing that went well for Gatorade this year was to discontinue their
Tiger Woods product just before the famous golfer's PR melt down. Other than
that, they got little else right. After changing the name to "G," sales tanked
(down 18% in the first six months of the year) which the CEO of PepsiCo, Indra
Nooyi, explained away in an earnings conference call by saying that most of the
brand's losses had come from casual Gatorade drinkers, those that were buying
it simply for the taste.
Those users, she said, "didn't really have a right to exist in the Gatorade
world." Hard to explain how that didn't
get more attention in the blogosphere.
And all this time I thought that buying a bottle of the stuff was all I
needed to exist in the Gatorade world. Turns out you have to be approved. Who
knew?
General Motors:
Perhaps the most amazing statistic of the year: GM is down 1.8% in market share
this year. That doesn't sound bad at all, until you factor in the overall drop
in the total market. GM is in the midst
of a desperate attempt to save its core brands. Hummer was sold, Saturn, Saab
and Pontiac shut down. They have responded with improved warranties and claims
of energy efficiency. Gosh, if only they
hadn't gutted their brand by making inferior products for 20 years.
Crocs: A couple
of years ago, plastic shoes with the Crocs brand were a raging success. Today
sales are half what they were just a year ago. The company is on financial life
support. Their rapid rise as a brand appears to also be lesson in how fragile
trying to be hip and cool can be. One day you suddenly are. The next you just
aren't. Turns out we only liked Crocs. We didn't like-like them.
RIP:
Vista: Was there
anyone sorry to see this product disappear? Anyone at all?
Circuit City:
Once a perennial Wall Street darling. Now an online shell of its old self.
Saturn: Every
Saturn owner I ever met seemed to have exceptional loyalty to the brand. Now GM
says it was never profitable. I guess Saturn wasn't such a different kind of GM
car after all.
Have a Happy Brand New Year!
Author: Dave Taylor
As Appeared In: Central Penn Business Journal
Tell us what you think about this story.
Return to News and Views
|